NOTICE OF CONVENING FY-11 PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL (CIVIL LAW) AND ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD:
UNCLASSIFIED//
ROUTINE
R 290430Z JAN 10
BT
UNCLAS
PASS TO OFFICE CODES:
FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1//
TO NAVADMIN
INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1//
NAVADMIN 037/10
MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/JAN//
SUBJ/NOTICE OF CONVENING FY-11 PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE
ADVOCATE GENERAL (CIVIL LAW) AND ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF
THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD//
RMKS/1. THIS NAVADMIN ANNOUNCES THE NOTICE OF CONVENING DATE FOR
SUBJECT SELECTION BOARD AS 18 MARCH 2010. THE FOLLOWING LIST INDICATES
THE NAME, ACTIVE-DUTY LIST NUMBER, AND DATE OF RANK OF THE SENIOR AND
JUNIOR OFFICERS ON THE ACTIVE DUTY LIST IN THE COMPETITIVE CATEGORY OF
NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S CORPS, WHO ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONSIDERATION
AS OF THE DATE OF THIS NAVADMIN.
SENIOR ELIGIBLE - WAGNER, D. A. 012318-00 1 OCT 2000
JUNIOR ELIGIBLE - MCCARTHY, P. M. 018394-00 1 FEB 2007
2. ONLY ELIGIBLE OFFICERS MAY COMMUNICATE WITH A SELECTION BOARD.
ALL CORRESPONDENCE MUST ARRIVE NOT LATER THAN THE CONVENING DATE OF THE
BOARD AND SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO:
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND (NPC) CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER PRESIDENT, FY-11
ACTIVE DUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY SELECTION
BOARD #109 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON, TN 38055 THE WRITTEN
COMMUNICATION MAY CALL TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOARD INFORMATION THE
OFFICER CONSIDERS RELEVANT. THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION MAY INCLUDE, AS
ENCLOSURES, CORRESPONDENCE FROM ANY INDIVIDUAL CONCERNING THE ELIGIBLE
OFFICER. CORRESPONDENCE NOT ORIGINATED BY THE ELIGIBLE OFFICER,
INCLUDING ENDORSEMENTS TO THE OFFICER'S LETTER AND LETTERS WRITTEN ON
BEHALF OF THAT OFFICER, MUST CONTAIN A WRITTEN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY THE
ELIGIBLE OFFICER THAT HE OR SHE DESIRES SUCH CORRESPONDENCE BE
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD.
CORRESPONDENCE WITHOUT SUCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS CONSIDERED THIRD PARTY
CORRESPONDENCE AND WILL BE RETURNED. CLASSIFIED CORRESPONDENCE WILL
NOT BE ACCEPTED.
3. ELIGIBLE OFFICERS NOT WANTING TO BE CONSIDERED BY THIS BOARD MAY
SUBMIT A REQUEST INDICATING THE DESIRE THAT THEIR RECORD NOT BE
CONSIDERED. OFFICERS SUBMITTING REQUESTS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED WILL NOT
BE ELIGIBLE AND THEIR RECORDS WILL NOT BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR
CONSIDERATION.
4. THE FOLLOWING OFFICERS ARE NOT ELIGIBLE AND THEIR RECORDS WILL NOT
BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION: ANY OFFICER WHO HAS AN
APPROVED SEPARATION/RETIREMENT DATE AS OF THE CONVENING DATE OF THE
BOARD; OR WAS RECOMMENDED BY A PREVIOUS SELECTION BOARD FOR APPOINTMENT
AS ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY OR LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF (PURSUANT TO SECTION 156 OF TITLE
10 U.S. CODE).
5. RELEASED BY VADM MARK FERGUSON, N1.//
BT
#0001
NNNN