RATING MERGER UPDATE AND OVERVIEW:
UNCLASSIFIED// R 301929Z NOV 07 FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// UNCLAS //N01223// NAVADMIN 319/07 MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/NOV// SUBJ/RATING MERGER UPDATE AND OVERVIEW// RMKS/1. THIS NAVADMIN PROVIDES AN UPDATE REGARDING THE PROPOSED MERGERS WITHIN THE IC/ET AND ENGINEERING COMMUNITIES, SUMMARIZES RECENT RATING MERGERS, PROVIDES THE STATUS OF ONGOING MERGER PLANS AND COMMUNICATES THE STRATEGY ASSOCIATED WITH THE NAVY?S DECISIONS TO MERGE RATINGS. 2. TWO RATING MERGERS IN THE APPROVAL-DECISION PHASE HAVE BEEN PLACED ON HOLD OR DISAPPROVED. A. THE PROPOSAL TO MERGE THE CONVENTIONAL ENGINEERING RATINGS, GOING FROM EIGHT TO THREE RATINGS, IS ON HOLD UNTIL FISCAL YEAR 2010, AT WHICH TIME THE PROPOSAL WILL BE RE-EVALUATED. ALTHOUGH FUTURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS WILL LIKELY REQUIRE A SINGLE ENGINEER TO HAVE BROADER KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES, OUR TRAINING AND DETAILING INFRASTRUCTURE CURRENTLY DO NOT SUPPORT THIS TRANSITION. B. THE PROPOSAL TO MERGE ET/IC AND DISESTABLISH THE IC RATING IS DISAPPROVED. ALTHOUGH THE WORK AND SKILLS PERFORMED BY THE IC AND ET RATING HAVE A FOUNDATION IN BASIC ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM, THE DETAILED ANALYSIS REVEALED HIGHLY SPECIFIC WORK, SKILLS AND EQUIPMENT WHICH REQUIRE EXTENSIVE AMOUNTS OF UNIQUE INDIVIDUAL TRAINING. THE VOLUME AND COMPLEXITY OF THIS UNIQUE TRAINING IS ACHIEVED IN THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND COST EFFICIENT MANNER THROUGH THE CONTINUATION OF IC AND ET AS SEPARATE RATINGS. WITH THAT IN MIND, WE DECIDED TO MOVE THE IC RATING FROM CENTER FOR NAVAL ENGINEERING (CNE) TO CENTER FOR SURFACE COMBAT SYSTEMS (CSCS). ADDITIONALLY, WE ARE EVALUATING A SHIFT OF THE IC DIVISION TO THE COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT ONBOARD SHIPS. 3. ALL RATING MERGERS UNDERGO A THREE PHASE PROCESS; PROPOSAL-STUDY, APPROVAL-DECISION AND EXECUTION. A. CURRENTLY IN THE EXECUTION PHASE ARE TWO RATING MERGERS; GM/TM AND YN/CTA. THE MERGER OF GM/TM WAS APPROVED IN NOVEMBER 2006 (NAVADMIN 049/07) AND BECAME EFFECTIVE ON 1 OCT 07. MERGING THE GM AND TM RATINGS IMPROVED EFFICIENCY IN TRAINING, DIVERSITY IN THIS CAREER FIELD, AND SUPPORTED INCREASED FLEXIBILITY IN DETAILING. B. THE MERGER OF CTA/YN WAS APPROVED IN MAY 07 (NAVADMIN 118/07), AND BECAME EFFECTIVE ON 1 OCT 07. BY MERGING THE YN AND CTA RATINGS, WE BETTER ALIGNED ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL FUNCTIONS PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED BY THESE TWO RATINGS, IMPROVED TRAINING PROGRAM EFFICIENCY, ENHANCED CAREER FIELD DIVERSITY AND PROVIDED GREATER DETAILING FLEXIBILITY. C. FOR YN/CTA AND GM/TM PERSONNEL, THESE MERGERS OFFER A BROADER CAREER PATH, ADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVES FOR PERSONAL/ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, IMPROVED ADVANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND BETTER QUALITY OF SERVICE. 4. THE RATING MERGER OF OS/QM REACHED THE APPROVAL-DECISION PHASE IN 2007 BUT WAS DISAPPROVED. IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS DETERMINED WHILE OS AND QM RATINGS SHARE SOME COMMON SKILL SETS, ESPECIALLY RELATIVE TO TASKS THEY PERFORM AS JUNIOR SAILORS ON SHIPS, WE FOUND AS SAILORS BECOME MORE SENIOR, EACH RATING FOCUSES ON DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL AND WARFARE PRIORITIES. IN FACT, CAREFUL ANALYSIS AND CONSIDERATION OF OPERATIONAL AND WARFIGHTING NEEDS CONFIRMED A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SKILLS, ABOUT 32 PERCENT, WERE STILL UNIQUE TO EACH RATING. ADDITIONALLY, A BUSINESS-CASE ANALYSIS REVEALED THE COST OF TRAINING WAS ABOUT THE SAME, WITH OR WITHOUT A MERGER, AFTER INVESTMENTS HAD BEEN MADE IN IMPROVED CURRICULUM AND TRAINING PROCESSES. DURING THE COURSE OF THE STUDY, DISCUSSIONS WITH OUR SENIOR ENLISTED LEADERS REVEALED A STRONG BELIEF THAT THE QUARTERMASTER, AS ONE OF THE OLDEST RATINGS IN THE NAVY, IS DEEPLY ROOTED IN THE CULTURE OF OUR NAUTICAL HERITAGE. THESE FACTORS, COMBINED WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL ROLE OF POSITIONAL ACCURACY IN SAFE NAVIGATION, LED TO THE DECISION TO MAINTAIN THE UNIQUENESS OF THESE TWO RATINGS. 5. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) GENERAL RATING IN THE SELECTED RESERVE WAS APPROVED AND ANNOUNCED IN NAVADMIN 017/06 TO IMPROVE NAVY EOD TOTAL FORCE READINESS AND SUPPORT OPTIMAL MANNING. BY ALLOWING SAILORS TO FOCUS ON RATING SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING SYSTEMS, THE NAVY REDUCED TRAINING INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS, WHILE BROADENING THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, CAREER OPPORTUNITIES, AND QUALITY OF SERVICE FOR OUR SAILORS. 6. IN SUMMARY, WE REVIEW EACH RATING MERGER PROPOSAL IN A WAY WHICH ATTEMPTS TO BALANCE THE NEEDS OF SAILORS, OUR CHANGING NAVY AND THE EVOLVING OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ? MISSIONS AND TECHNOLOGY. FIRST, WE SEEK TO BENEFIT SAILORS AND OUR NAVY BY DIVERSIFYING SKILLS, IMPROVING ADVANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND ALLOWING SAILORS TO FILL A WIDER RANGE OF BILLETS. SECOND, WE ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE THE FLEET WITH THE RIGHT SKILL MIX AND REDUCE REDUNDANCIES. LAST, MERGERS ALLOW THE NAVY TO BETTER REFLECT SAILORS? SKILL SETS AND DUTIES PERFORMED, AND ALIGN RATINGS TO CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES AND EMERGING SKILL SETS. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WE GET IT RIGHT FOR OUR SAILORS AND OUR NAVY. 7. RELEASED BY VADM J. C. HARVEY, JR., N1.// BT NNNN