RATING MERGER UPDATE AND OVERVIEW:
UNCLASSIFIED//
R 301929Z NOV 07
FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1//
TO NAVADMIN
INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1//
UNCLAS //N01223//
NAVADMIN 319/07
MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/NOV//
SUBJ/RATING MERGER UPDATE AND OVERVIEW//
RMKS/1. THIS NAVADMIN PROVIDES AN UPDATE REGARDING THE PROPOSED MERGERS
WITHIN THE IC/ET AND ENGINEERING COMMUNITIES, SUMMARIZES RECENT RATING
MERGERS, PROVIDES THE STATUS OF ONGOING MERGER PLANS AND COMMUNICATES
THE STRATEGY ASSOCIATED WITH THE NAVY?S DECISIONS TO MERGE RATINGS.
2. TWO RATING MERGERS IN THE APPROVAL-DECISION PHASE HAVE BEEN PLACED
ON HOLD OR DISAPPROVED.
A. THE PROPOSAL TO MERGE THE CONVENTIONAL ENGINEERING RATINGS,
GOING FROM EIGHT TO THREE RATINGS, IS ON HOLD UNTIL FISCAL YEAR 2010,
AT WHICH TIME THE PROPOSAL WILL BE RE-EVALUATED. ALTHOUGH FUTURE
ENGINEERING SYSTEMS WILL LIKELY REQUIRE A SINGLE ENGINEER TO HAVE
BROADER KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES, OUR TRAINING AND DETAILING
INFRASTRUCTURE CURRENTLY DO NOT SUPPORT THIS TRANSITION.
B. THE PROPOSAL TO MERGE ET/IC AND DISESTABLISH THE IC RATING IS
DISAPPROVED. ALTHOUGH THE WORK AND SKILLS PERFORMED BY THE IC AND ET
RATING HAVE A FOUNDATION IN BASIC ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM, THE
DETAILED ANALYSIS REVEALED HIGHLY SPECIFIC WORK, SKILLS AND EQUIPMENT
WHICH REQUIRE EXTENSIVE AMOUNTS OF UNIQUE INDIVIDUAL TRAINING. THE
VOLUME AND COMPLEXITY OF THIS UNIQUE TRAINING IS ACHIEVED IN THE MOST
EFFECTIVE AND COST EFFICIENT MANNER THROUGH THE CONTINUATION OF IC AND
ET AS SEPARATE RATINGS. WITH THAT IN MIND, WE DECIDED TO MOVE THE IC
RATING FROM CENTER FOR NAVAL ENGINEERING (CNE) TO CENTER FOR SURFACE
COMBAT SYSTEMS (CSCS). ADDITIONALLY, WE ARE EVALUATING A SHIFT OF THE
IC DIVISION TO THE COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT ONBOARD SHIPS.
3. ALL RATING MERGERS UNDERGO A THREE PHASE PROCESS; PROPOSAL-STUDY,
APPROVAL-DECISION AND EXECUTION.
A. CURRENTLY IN THE EXECUTION PHASE ARE TWO RATING MERGERS; GM/TM
AND YN/CTA. THE MERGER OF GM/TM WAS APPROVED IN NOVEMBER 2006
(NAVADMIN 049/07) AND BECAME EFFECTIVE ON 1 OCT 07. MERGING THE GM AND
TM RATINGS IMPROVED EFFICIENCY IN TRAINING, DIVERSITY IN THIS
CAREER FIELD, AND SUPPORTED INCREASED FLEXIBILITY IN DETAILING.
B. THE MERGER OF CTA/YN WAS APPROVED IN MAY 07 (NAVADMIN 118/07),
AND BECAME EFFECTIVE ON 1 OCT 07. BY MERGING THE YN AND CTA RATINGS,
WE BETTER ALIGNED ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL FUNCTIONS PREVIOUSLY
PERFORMED BY THESE TWO RATINGS, IMPROVED TRAINING PROGRAM EFFICIENCY,
ENHANCED CAREER FIELD DIVERSITY AND PROVIDED GREATER DETAILING
FLEXIBILITY.
C. FOR YN/CTA AND GM/TM PERSONNEL, THESE MERGERS OFFER A BROADER
CAREER PATH, ADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVES FOR PERSONAL/ PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT, IMPROVED ADVANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND BETTER QUALITY OF
SERVICE.
4. THE RATING MERGER OF OS/QM REACHED THE APPROVAL-DECISION PHASE IN
2007 BUT WAS DISAPPROVED. IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS DETERMINED WHILE OS AND QM
RATINGS SHARE SOME COMMON SKILL SETS, ESPECIALLY RELATIVE TO TASKS THEY
PERFORM AS JUNIOR SAILORS ON SHIPS, WE FOUND AS SAILORS BECOME MORE
SENIOR, EACH RATING FOCUSES ON DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL AND WARFARE
PRIORITIES. IN FACT, CAREFUL ANALYSIS AND CONSIDERATION OF OPERATIONAL
AND WARFIGHTING NEEDS CONFIRMED A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SKILLS, ABOUT
32 PERCENT, WERE STILL UNIQUE TO EACH RATING.
ADDITIONALLY, A BUSINESS-CASE ANALYSIS REVEALED THE COST OF TRAINING
WAS ABOUT THE SAME, WITH OR WITHOUT A MERGER, AFTER INVESTMENTS HAD
BEEN MADE IN IMPROVED CURRICULUM AND TRAINING PROCESSES. DURING THE
COURSE OF THE STUDY, DISCUSSIONS WITH OUR SENIOR ENLISTED LEADERS
REVEALED A STRONG BELIEF THAT THE QUARTERMASTER, AS ONE OF THE OLDEST
RATINGS IN THE NAVY, IS DEEPLY ROOTED IN THE CULTURE OF OUR NAUTICAL
HERITAGE. THESE FACTORS, COMBINED WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL ROLE OF
POSITIONAL ACCURACY IN SAFE NAVIGATION, LED TO THE DECISION TO MAINTAIN
THE UNIQUENESS OF THESE TWO RATINGS.
5. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) GENERAL
RATING IN THE SELECTED RESERVE WAS APPROVED AND ANNOUNCED IN NAVADMIN
017/06 TO IMPROVE NAVY EOD TOTAL FORCE READINESS AND SUPPORT OPTIMAL
MANNING. BY ALLOWING SAILORS TO FOCUS ON RATING SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGY
AND TRAINING SYSTEMS, THE NAVY REDUCED TRAINING INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS,
WHILE BROADENING THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, CAREER OPPORTUNITIES,
AND QUALITY OF SERVICE FOR OUR SAILORS.
6. IN SUMMARY, WE REVIEW EACH RATING MERGER PROPOSAL IN A WAY WHICH
ATTEMPTS TO BALANCE THE NEEDS OF SAILORS, OUR CHANGING NAVY AND THE
EVOLVING OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ? MISSIONS AND TECHNOLOGY. FIRST, WE
SEEK TO BENEFIT SAILORS AND OUR NAVY BY DIVERSIFYING SKILLS, IMPROVING
ADVANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND ALLOWING SAILORS TO FILL A WIDER RANGE OF
BILLETS. SECOND, WE ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE THE FLEET WITH THE RIGHT SKILL
MIX AND REDUCE REDUNDANCIES. LAST, MERGERS ALLOW THE NAVY TO BETTER
REFLECT SAILORS? SKILL SETS AND DUTIES PERFORMED, AND ALIGN RATINGS TO
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES AND EMERGING SKILL SETS. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT
WE GET IT RIGHT FOR OUR SAILORS AND OUR NAVY.
7. RELEASED BY VADM J. C. HARVEY, JR., N1.//
BT
NNNN